| A recent newspaper exposé of | | | | of prior discipline in another state may not be |
| California-licensed nurses who have been disciplined | | | | available. Or the out-of-state records may not |
| for professional misconduct in other states has | | | | meet the standards of admissible evidence set |
| resulted in a California-wide effort to revoke all of | | | | forth in the California Evidence Code (California law |
| those nurses' California licenses. So committed is | | | | will apply at the hearing.) The discipline imposed by |
| California's Governor to this agenda, that he | | | | the prior state may have been based on conduct |
| recently fired the head administrator and replaced | | | | that is lawful in California. Many procedural defects |
| all of the members of the Board of Registered | | | | may exist in the out-of-state disciplinary process. |
| Nursing. The new appointees have been given | | | | Many more reasons exist for invalidating or |
| their marching orders, and more than 2,000 | | | | reducing the State's claims. The out-of-state |
| Registered Nurses are slated for license | | | | discipline may have occurred a number of years |
| revocation on the basis of prior conduct in other | | | | ago, and the nurse may have current relevant |
| states. It seems clear that Licensed Vocational | | | | work experience that demonstrates that any |
| Nurses will face similar issues soon. | | | | previous performance problems have been |
| Obviously, some nurses should not be practicing | | | | addressed and resolved. The nurse may have |
| anywhere. But California apparently assumes that | | | | evidence of further professional training since the |
| all nurses with license issues in other states should | | | | time of the out-of-state discipline, or the nurse |
| also be barred here. And nurses who are now on | | | | may have completed rehabilitation or received |
| California's hit-list might assume that loss of their | | | | effective counseling. The nurse may be able to |
| California licenses is inevitable. Neither of these | | | | demonstrate a new maturity, significant changes |
| assumptions is supported by logic or law. | | | | based on life experiences (parenthood, military |
| License Discipline and Revocation in California | | | | service, successful employment, religious |
| A nursing license-RN or LVN-once earned, is the | | | | enlightenment) and improvements in professional |
| property of the nurse. And, like any other | | | | competence. Any similar facts would be compelling |
| property, such as real estate (think foreclosure) | | | | evidence where the State's only basis to discipline |
| or money (think of fines imposed by courts), the | | | | the nursing license is out-of-state prior misconduct. |
| nursing license cannot be taken away (revoked), | | | | These are only a few of the more obvious kinds |
| even for a short time (suspension), and cannot be | | | | of evidence that may be utilized to defend a |
| diminished or restricted in any way (probationary | | | | nursing license in an administrative hearing. |
| conditions) without two things: good cause and | | | | Countless others exist. |
| due process. | | | | The Economics of Defending Against Discipline of |
| There is a vast body of law as to what | | | | the Nursing License |
| constitutes good cause. But here's the take-away | | | | Some nurses (and other professional and |
| you need to remember: the mere fact that in the | | | | occupational licensees) believe that they cannot |
| past some other state revoked or disciplined a | | | | "afford" to invoke the fair hearing process and |
| nursing license issued by that state does not, by | | | | defend their license against the State. But |
| itself, constitute good cause for California to | | | | consider: what do you earn in a year from |
| discipline a current California nursing license. | | | | nursing? In two years? In three? A license |
| As for due process, that means that California | | | | revocation will prohibit re-application for a new |
| cannot simply unilaterally revoke or discipline the | | | | license for at least three years and probably |
| license based on what State officials believe to be | | | | longer. You do the math: can you afford not to |
| good cause. Instead, California must first notify | | | | defend your right to earn your living? |
| the nurse of the State's intention to discipline or | | | | How to Begin to Defend Against Discipline of a |
| revoke the license. Then the State must offer | | | | California Nursing License |
| the nurse an opportunity to deny that the license | | | | The one certain way to lose your California |
| should be disciplined, and an opportunity to | | | | nursing license on the basis of prior out-of-state |
| demonstrate why. The demonstration of why the | | | | professional discipline is to do nothing when you |
| license should not be disciplined takes place at an | | | | receive a notice of proposed action from the |
| administrative hearing where the nurse's advocate | | | | State of California. Do not let this happen to you! |
| can challenge all or any of the State's reasons and | | | | Read the notice. It will give you a very short |
| evidence in front of an impartial administrative law | | | | window of time in which to provide written notice |
| judge. | | | | of denial of the charges and your demand for |
| Also at the hearing, the nurse's advocate will | | | | hearing. Do not let this deadline pass! It is critical to |
| introduce evidence that the nurse is competent | | | | submit your denial/demand before the time |
| and that there presently exists no reason to deny | | | | expires. Then, get a lawyer. |
| the right to practice nursing in California. The judge | | | | As the State will tell you, you are not required to |
| will give due consideration to the evidence put | | | | have an attorney to defend against discipline of |
| before him or her and issue (1) findings of fact | | | | an occupational license, or to obtain one after the |
| that explain what evidence the judge finds | | | | State has denied the application. But you should. |
| credible, (2) conclusions of law that explain what | | | | The State will be represented by an experienced |
| laws the judge thinks apply to the case, and (3) a | | | | and specialized attorney. Because the coming R.N. |
| proposed decision. The proposed decision is then | | | | cases will feature out-of-state records that may |
| forwarded to the Board for action, and the nurse | | | | be subject to challenge on the basis of California |
| and the nurse's advocate can appear before the | | | | evidentiary standards, these are not the kind of |
| Board to argue in favor of or in opposition to the | | | | cases where it will be okay if the only party |
| Administrative Law Judge's proposed decision. | | | | without an attorney is the nurse with everything |
| Opportunities to Defeat Discipline at the | | | | to lose. |
| Administrative Hearing | | | | Your nursing license is your asset. It has value: |
| Anyone who is not familiar with the hearing | | | | real, quantifiable, actual value. Protect it by |
| process might not realize that the hearing offers | | | | exercising of all of the legal rights it carries. |
| many opportunities to the nurse to avoid or | | | | California may be at war with its dual- and |
| reduce the discipline against the license that is | | | | multi-state licensed nurses, but you need not be |
| proposed by the State. For example, the records | | | | one of the casualties. |