Establishing the Law During the California Gold Rush

During the early days of the gold rush, thea very neat and specific speech. Once his motion
pioneer miners were forced to establish and formwas duly seconded, the chance was given for any
their own laws. Up in the mining camps thereopposition to make its case and provide further
were no courts, and many of the soldiers whodiscussion. In time the matter was put to a vote.
were sent to keep the peace in California in theIf the chairman declared the change carried by
earliest days after the US took possession of thethe ayes, the secretary would write it all down,
land, simply deserted their ranks and headed forand it became the law of that district. Normally
the gold fields to seek their fortune. Atwo or three other acts were considered and
consideration of the simple processes and lawsvoted upon, and when the business was
they established with the quick acting justice theyconcluded, a vote of thanks to the chairman was
distributed makes for an interesting contrast withpassed for his supervision of the meeting. The
the plodding, bloated, political and exorbitantlymeeting was then officially declared to be
expensive justice system we operate today.dissolved, and the crowd accordingly dribbled into
The mining laws of the California gold fields, asthe nearest bar, where the legislators, in small
was the case in all the various diggings throughoutdetachments, pledged success to each other with
the mining region, were made at official groupwhiskey as fast as the storekeeper could pour
meetings of the miners held for that specificthe drinks. While the legislature was in session,
purpose. Because of this the requirements didhowever, everything was conducted with a
vary significantly from district to district. Unlike soserious demeanor and the utmost formality.
many modern laws, they were not designed byWhen the miners could not come to any
hungry lawyers seeking to pad their wallets, andsettlement of some dispute among themselves,
were generally very few and simple. These basicthey would leave the decision to a jury of miners.
standards defined how many feet of ground oneWhen a miner's court was to be held, a formal
man was entitled to hold in a ravine how much upnotice was accordingly sent to all the prospectors
on the bank, and in the bed of the creek; howwithin two or three miles up and down the creek,
many of these claims he could hold at a time; andrequesting them to assemble at the claim in
how long he could absent himself from his claimquestion on a certain afternoon. Although a miner
without forfeiting it. This was the case because acalculates an hour lost as so much money out of
man was expected to work his claim each day. Ifhis pocket, it was common that most of the
he left the area permanently, his claims wereresidents would turn out as they were all
considered abandoned. In many areas, a digginginterested in supporting the laws of the region.
tool like a pick, left in the hole was all that wasThe two opposing parties then, having tossed up
necessary to secure ones spot against othera coin for the first pick, would choose a number
claimants. The rules also declared what wasof jurymen each from the assembled crowd.
necessary to be done in taking up and securing aThen the jury would normally sit themselves all
claim which, for want of water, or from anytogether in an exalted position on a heap of
other cause, could not be worked at the time.stones and dirt (as was common on the claims
They also provided for various specialfrom the normal operations of digging). One of
contingencies incidental to the peculiar nature ofthe plaintiffs, who had been chosen as spokesman
those diggings. Each miner had one vote andfor his party, would then make a speech, calling
acted as his own legislator. It was a plain andseveral witnesses to prove his statements, and
simple democracy unequalled since the days ofciting the recognized laws of the diggings in
the Athenian Greeks.support of his claims. The defendants would follow
Of course, like all laws and regulations, at timesin the same manner, making the most of their
they required some revision and amendment, toversion of the case. During this time, the general
suit the progress and changes of the times. Inpublic, sitting in groups on the different heaps of
those cases, any necessary meetings were heldstones piled up between the holes with which the
on certain Sunday afternoons specifically set asideground was honeycombed, would smoke their
for legislative purposes. The miners typically metpipes and watch the proceedings. After the
in front of the general store, often reachingplaintiff and defendant had each had their turn to
numbers of several hundred. The most respectedsay all they had to say about the matter, the
man in the camp was generally selected tominer's jury would examine the state of the
preside over the meeting. If a chair and tableground which was in dispute. They would then call
were handy they were used, but if there was asome more witnesses to give further information,
lack of the proper furniture, he might stand uponwhich is much different from our modern
an empty pork-barrel or climb up into the back ofprocedures in which a jury may ask no questions.
a wagon, which gave him a commanding positionOnce all the information was considered, those
looking down on the crowd. Another respectedpioneers would put their shaggy heads together
man with the necessary literary skills of readingfor a few minutes, and pronounce their decision.
and writing was appointed secretary, and heIt is hard to fault the simple wisdom and
would place his writing materials on some flatstraightforward justice of the pioneer miners.
surface alongside of the chairman. The chairmanTheir methods established a fair, democratic and
then, addressing the crowd, would then generallyjust way of handling the law without the
explain the object for which the meeting hadformality, expense and endless delays of the
been called. He would open the floor to hear anysystems that we have now. In time, the normal
gentleman who had any remarks to offer on thetrappings of civilization came to the hills and the
topic at hand. Eventually someone would proposeprospector's laws were done away with. I am not
a specific amendment of the law relating to aso sure that the changes which came with
certain description of claim, expressing the point in"civilization" were any kind of an improvement.