What Does California Law Say About Non-Profit Sales of Medical Cannabis to Qualified Patients?

How can we account for what is perhaps one ofcontrolled substance, precursor, or analog specified
the most dramatic legal disparities in medicalin this division, and every building or place wherein
cannabis to date? The issue of non-profit "sale" ofor upon which those acts take place, is a nuisance
medical cannabis to qualified patients via collectiveswhich shall be enjoined, abated, and prevented,
and cooperatives. There's nothing else like thisand for which damages may be recovered,
dispute. What do the experts say about thiswhether it is a public or private nuisance.]
anyway?The Health and Safety Code section 11360
Steve Cooley, The Los Angeles District Attorney,specifically says "sells". Not only that, it also says:
disagrees with Jerry Brown, the California State"gives away" and "furnishes". How come the LA
Attorney General.District Attorney's office says "all sales are illegal"
How could two prominent state-employedand non-profit storefront medical cannabis
attorneys come to wholly different conclusions ondispensing collectives/cooperatives are banned?
the answer? First the Los Angeles DistrictIn that same bill,
Attorney claims "all sales are illegal". The California"11362.775. Qualified patients, persons with valid
State Attorney General was sure enough to writeidentification cards, and the designated primary
in his guidelines that "storefront collectives may becaregivers of qualified patientsand persons with
legal under state law". How could this be? After all,identification cards, who associate within the State
each attorney is looking at the same thing, right?of California in order collectively or cooperatively
So what is the answer? What does the law say?to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes, shall
COMPASSIONATE-USE ACT 1996not solely on the basis of that fact be subject to
Proposition 215 which was approved by astate criminal sanctions under Section 11357,
majority of Californians in 1996 and it became11358, 11359, 11360, 11366, 11366.5, or 11570."
known as the Compassionate-Use Act. TheAgain, it says that patients can collectively
statute itself does not say anything about "sales"cultivate cannabis and distribute it amongst
but it does talk about "possession", "cultivating",themselves for non-profit. Again, the distribution
obtaining medical cannabis, about affordability andof medical cannabis is separate from the
"distribution".cultivation just like the manufacturing of my
It does say that qualified patients and theirvicodin is located separate from my pharmacy.
primary caregivers will not be victim to criminalThe Medical Marijuana Act also calls on the State
issues:Attorney General to provide guidelines related to
"(B) To ensure that patients and their primarymedical cannabis:
caregivers who obtain and use marijuana for"The bill would require the Attorney General to
medical purposes upon the recommendation of adevelop and adopt guidelines to ensure the
physician are not subject to criminal prosecutionsecurity and non-diversion of marijuana grown for
or sanction."medical use, as specified."
And it also pushes governments to help ensureAnd that exactly what State Attorney General,
"safe and affordable access" to medical cannabisJerry Brown did in the late summer of 2008.
for "all qualified patients".GUIDELINES FOR THE SECURITY AND
"(C) To encourage the federal and stateNON-DIVERSION OF MARIJUANA GROWN FOR
governments to implement a plan for the safeMEDICAL USE August 2008
and affordable distribution of marijuana to allTo fulfill his mandate, the State Attorney General
patients in medical need of marijuana."release these guidelines to help law enforcements
The Los Angeles District Attorney, Steve Cooley,do their jobs according to State law and to help
had State and Federal law enforcement agentspatients understand those laws.
raid a medical cannabis collective and arrest atThe guidelines state non-profit storefront Medical
least 3 people, the week before Christmas. HeCannabis Dispensing Collectives and Cooperatives
insists "all sales are illegal". This seems to becould be legal under state law if they followed the
against the letter and spirit of the law, not theguidelines and the above laws.
mention the spirit of the season."It is the opinion of this Office that a properly
Also if all "sales" are illegal, why does theorganized and operated collective or cooperative
Compassionate-Use Act say "affordable"? If thethat dispenses medical marijuana through a
patients are financially responsible for the cannabis,storefront may be lawful under California law"
how does Cooley expect the currency to beThe State Attorney General confirms what the
exchanged? What's wrong with incrementallaw says. The Attorney General is the
reimbursements?highest-ranking legal employee of the State of
MEDICAL MARIJUANA PROGRAM OF 2004California. His office also responded to the issues
The Medical Marijuana Program (MMP) came intoraised in Los Angeles by City Attorney's office.
law in 2004 through the legislative approval ofAccording to the New York Times on October 17:
Senate Bill 420. It was the state's attempt "toChristine Gasparac, a spokeswoman for State
implement a plan for the safe and affordableAttorney General Jerry Brown, said that after Mr.
distribution of marijuana to all patients in medicalTrutanich's comments in Los Angeles, law
need of marijuana," as the Compassionate-Useenforcement officials and advocates from around
Act of 1996 (Prop 215) encourages the State andthe state had called seeking clarity on medical
Federal government to do.marijuana laws.
The MMP improves access to medical cannabis forMr. Brown has issued legal guidelines that allow for
qualified patients by approving collectives andnonprofit sales of medical marijuana, she said. But,
cooperatives.she added, with laws being interpreted differently,
"(3) Enhance the access of patients and"the final answer will eventually come from the
caregivers to medical marijuana through collective,courts."
cooperative cultivation projects."So what do the courts say?
What Steve Cooley doesn't seem to understandPEOPLE v. MENTCH
is non-profit storefront Medical CannabisThe District Attorney's office would have you
Dispensing Collectives/Cooperatives are thebelieve that the Mentch decision outlaws
distribution aspect of "cultivation projects". Just likenon-profit storefront Medical Cannabis Dispensing
a collective cultivation farm wouldn't haveCollectives/Cooperatives and makes "all sales
customers come to the farm to get theirillegal" but that decision has to do with the
tomatoes, they would have to get their collectivedefinition of "primary caregiver" not sales.
tomatoes at a farmer's market or distributionMentch had 82 marijuana plants growing in his
location-- that's how medical cannabis collectivehome and he sold the medicine to 5 people who
cultivations occur. Grown in one location forcame to his home with the primary purpose of
safety and other reasons, then distributed atbuying cannabis. The majority of the plants in
another location.Mentch's home belonged to him as he testified.
The MMP goes on to talk about all the criminalTheir operations was not a collective or a
statutes that qualified patients and primarycooperative nor a storefront. Mentch owned
caregivers are exempt from. In section 11362.765,Hemporium, a for-profit care giving and
it says: "shall not be subject, on that sole basis, toconsultancy business, not a non-profit collective or
criminal liability under Section 11357, 11358, 11359,a cooperative.
11360, 11366, 11366.5, or 11570."Based off the evidence the courts concluded that
Let's look at each of these one by one:Mentch's operation was primarily a for-profit
11357: [possession],commercial venture and that he was not a
11358: [cultivation],primary caregiver for those he supplied medical
11359: [possession for sale],cannabis to from his home business. I've written
11360: ["transports, imports into this state, sells,about this in depth here.
furnishes, administers, or gives away"- or offersSo there you have what the courts say, what
to or attempts to do any of those],the State Attorney says, and what the laws say;
11366: [Every person who opens or maintains anyall confirm non-profit storefront dispensing of
place for the purpose of unlawfully selling, givingmedical cannabis can be legal under State law.
away, or using any controlled substance]Now the Los Angeles District Attorney must
11366.5 [Managing a place for manufacture,obey the law and the will of the people and stop
storage and/or the distribution of a controlledwasting time and resources to hurt medical
substance]cannabis patients especially just before Christmas.
11570 [Every building or place used for theEspecially when there are over 7,000 untested
purpose of unlawfully selling, serving, storing,rape kits that the District Attorney claims to not
keeping, manufacturing, or giving away anyhave the resources to handle.